tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904738139236094464.post6232103752695511636..comments2009-09-20T20:02:16.110-04:00Jeffrey Pinyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08758581112217835988noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904738139236094464.post-1733332091215617202009-09-20T20:02:16.110-04:002009-09-20T20:02:16.110-04:00I wasn&#39;t planning on writing about the vestments particular to the Extraordinary Form (since the book is about the new English translation of the Ordinary Form).<br /><br />I&#39;ll consider the maniple, given its &quot;fuzzy&quot; liturgical status (although to be honest, I&#39;ve never heard of a priest celebrating the Ordinary Form wearing one).Jeffrey Pinyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08758581112217835988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2904738139236094464.post-7632392110957324712009-09-20T08:06:54.065-04:002009-09-20T08:06:54.065-04:00Great commentary!<br />looking forward to the maniple [its abrogation was <i>permissive</i>, not mandatory, IIRC, and is demanded in the EF], the dalmatic and tunicle, etc.<br />Regards<br />John UKJohn F H Hhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01032884551581324489noreply@blogger.com